<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The God Is You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegodisyou.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegodisyou.com</link>
	<description>Self Development For The Selfish</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Premier League Footballers Are Underpaid by Scotty Stevens</title>
		<link>http://thegodisyou.com/premier-league-footballers-are-underpaid/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegodisyou.com/premier-league-footballers-are-underpaid/#comment-599</guid>
		<description>I'm glad you agree, James.

At the end of the day, it's all about logic and honesty.

Scotty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m glad you agree, James.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, it&#039;s all about logic and honesty.</p>
<p>Scotty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is It Shallow To Go For Looks? by Scotty Stevens</title>
		<link>http://thegodisyou.com/is-it-shallow-to-go-for-looks/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegodisyou.com/is-it-shallow-to-go-for-looks/#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Being an atheist, I take anything written in the Bible with a pinch of salt. Actually, make that a handful.

And once again, it provides us with one of those classic dichotomies where both choices are from the same, illogical side of the coin; the logical side of the coin is completely dismissed.

Offering the ultimatum of 'having a little with ease' or 'having a lot with toil and struggle' is akin to a salesman offering the choice of 'green car' or 'red car' and omitting the 'no car' choice altogether.

Really, the choice should simply be 'have a little and be partially happy' or 'have a lot and be very happy'. Remember the definition of 'Shallow':

- Lacking depth of intellect, emotion, or knowledge.

To state that it is BETTER to have a little and be happy than to have a lot and be unhappy, is to assume that that which composes 'a lot' is the vain, undesired, and not the result of rational, intelligent thought.

That which that makes one happy improves the quality of one's life, and hence is generally considered desirable after rational, logical thought. It's a natural human longing to pursue happiness, so that which fits the bill is rightfully desired.

Who is the happiest man:

1) The man who hasn't stretched himself in his one and only life, is hard-up because of it, and drives a third-hand, fifteen year old rust bucket of a car? 

Or...

2) The man who has pushed himself in life, who has exercised his immense capability as a human, has a burgeoning business, is making some nice dough, and has a Ferrari and an Aston Martin in the garage?

The Bible would tell you that the first man is the happiest, because he 'has a little and hasn't toiled much for it'.

Logic will tell you it is the second man, since he has found his life purpose, is being rewarded for it, and is attaining that which makes his life more comfortable and pleasurable. Hence, that which improves the quality of one's life is NOT the result of shallow desire, 'chasing vain things'.

Indeed, the first man would appear to be the shallow man chasing vain things, since no man in his right mind dreams of driving a fifteen year old rust bucket of a car. And any man that tells you he does is a liar.

So where do YOU stand on this, Hudson?

Thanks for the comment ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being an atheist, I take anything written in the Bible with a pinch of salt. Actually, make that a handful.</p>
<p>And once again, it provides us with one of those classic dichotomies where both choices are from the same, illogical side of the coin; the logical side of the coin is completely dismissed.</p>
<p>Offering the ultimatum of &#039;having a little with ease&#039; or &#039;having a lot with toil and struggle&#039; is akin to a salesman offering the choice of &#039;green car&#039; or &#039;red car&#039; and omitting the &#039;no car&#039; choice altogether.</p>
<p>Really, the choice should simply be &#039;have a little and be partially happy&#039; or &#039;have a lot and be very happy&#039;. Remember the definition of &#039;Shallow&#039;:</p>
<p>- Lacking depth of intellect, emotion, or knowledge.</p>
<p>To state that it is BETTER to have a little and be happy than to have a lot and be unhappy, is to assume that that which composes &#039;a lot&#039; is the vain, undesired, and not the result of rational, intelligent thought.</p>
<p>That which that makes one happy improves the quality of one&#039;s life, and hence is generally considered desirable after rational, logical thought. It&#039;s a natural human longing to pursue happiness, so that which fits the bill is rightfully desired.</p>
<p>Who is the happiest man:</p>
<p>1) The man who hasn&#039;t stretched himself in his one and only life, is hard-up because of it, and drives a third-hand, fifteen year old rust bucket of a car? </p>
<p>Or&#8230;</p>
<p>2) The man who has pushed himself in life, who has exercised his immense capability as a human, has a burgeoning business, is making some nice dough, and has a Ferrari and an Aston Martin in the garage?</p>
<p>The Bible would tell you that the first man is the happiest, because he &#039;has a little and hasn&#039;t toiled much for it&#039;.</p>
<p>Logic will tell you it is the second man, since he has found his life purpose, is being rewarded for it, and is attaining that which makes his life more comfortable and pleasurable. Hence, that which improves the quality of one&#039;s life is NOT the result of shallow desire, &#039;chasing vain things&#039;.</p>
<p>Indeed, the first man would appear to be the shallow man chasing vain things, since no man in his right mind dreams of driving a fifteen year old rust bucket of a car. And any man that tells you he does is a liar.</p>
<p>So where do YOU stand on this, Hudson?</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment <img src='http://thegodisyou.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is It Shallow To Go For Looks? by hudson</title>
		<link>http://thegodisyou.com/is-it-shallow-to-go-for-looks/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegodisyou.com/is-it-shallow-to-go-for-looks/#comment-573</guid>
		<description>shallow is in what people desire.

in the book of ecclesiastes

it says that it is better to have aa little with quiet

than to have alot with much toil and chasing after vain things.

go figure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shallow is in what people desire.</p>
<p>in the book of ecclesiastes</p>
<p>it says that it is better to have aa little with quiet</p>
<p>than to have alot with much toil and chasing after vain things.</p>
<p>go figure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Premier League Footballers Are Underpaid by James Elliott</title>
		<link>http://thegodisyou.com/premier-league-footballers-are-underpaid/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>James Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegodisyou.com/premier-league-footballers-are-underpaid/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>I agree with this ENTIRELY

a lot of people simply say, "Footballers earn so much money for kicking a ball around." 

then I ask , "Do you have Sky TV?"

"Yes."

"Then you're paying their wages you hypocrit!

I also ask them, "Would you turn down Â£50,000 a week for doing the thing you love most? Or would you even turn down Â£50,000 a week for something you dont love?"

The answer is always the same

"No, I wouldnt."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this ENTIRELY</p>
<p>a lot of people simply say, &#034;Footballers earn so much money for kicking a ball around.&#034; </p>
<p>then I ask , &#034;Do you have Sky TV?&#034;</p>
<p>&#034;Yes.&#034;</p>
<p>&#034;Then you&#039;re paying their wages you hypocrit!</p>
<p>I also ask them, &#034;Would you turn down Â£50,000 a week for doing the thing you love most? Or would you even turn down Â£50,000 a week for something you dont love?&#034;</p>
<p>The answer is always the same</p>
<p>&#034;No, I wouldnt.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Seven Deadly Sins: Gluttony? by The Scotty Stevens Show</title>
		<link>http://thegodisyou.com/the-seven-deadly-sins-gluttony/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scotty Stevens Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegodisyou.com/the-seven-deadly-sins-gluttony/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Seven Deadly Sins: Gluttony?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Are you committing gluttony? Don&#8217;t worry, by the definition in the Seven Deadly Sins - most people are! It&#8217;s the topic of today&#8217;s article.
Head over to The God Is You and see me slate this ridiculous, apparent &#8217;sin&#8217; in my ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Seven Deadly Sins: Gluttony?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Are you committing gluttony? Don&#039;t worry, by the definition in the Seven Deadly Sins - most people are! It&#039;s the topic of today&#039;s article.<br />
Head over to The God Is You and see me slate this ridiculous, apparent &#039;sin&#039; in my &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Seven Deadly Sins: Lust? by The Scotty Stevens Show</title>
		<link>http://thegodisyou.com/the-seven-deadly-sins-lust/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scotty Stevens Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegodisyou.com/the-seven-deadly-sins-lust/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Seven Deadly Sins: Lust?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Over at The God Is You, I&#8217;ve just started a series of articles that look into The Seven Deadly Sins. My mission is to blow them wide open, as per usual  
Today, we start with &#8216;Lust&#8217;. Check out the post, &#8220;The Seven Deadly Sins: L...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Seven Deadly Sins: Lust?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Over at The God Is You, I&#039;ve just started a series of articles that look into The Seven Deadly Sins. My mission is to blow them wide open, as per usual<br />
Today, we start with &#039;Lust&#039;. Check out the post, &#034;The Seven Deadly Sins: L&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Is Faith? by The Scotty Stevens Show</title>
		<link>http://thegodisyou.com/what-is-faith/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scotty Stevens Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegodisyou.com/what-is-faith/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What Is Faith?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Faith is one of those words banded about by everyone, with nobody really knowing exactly what it means. It has religious as well as positive, self-development connotations.
Head over to The God Is You to read the article, &#8220;What Is Faith?&#8221; a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What Is Faith?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Faith is one of those words banded about by everyone, with nobody really knowing exactly what it means. It has religious as well as positive, self-development connotations.<br />
Head over to The God Is You to read the article, &#034;What Is Faith?&#034; a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oysters And Pearls by The Scotty Stevens Show</title>
		<link>http://thegodisyou.com/oysters-and-pearls/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scotty Stevens Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegodisyou.com/oysters-and-pearls/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Oysters And Pearls...&lt;/strong&gt;

A while ago, I wrote a cracking article all about &#8216;playing the field&#8217;. As it turns out, the article didn&#8217;t go into as much detail as it could have.
I&#8217;ve rectified this by being more explicit in today&#8217;s article on The God I...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Oysters And Pearls&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A while ago, I wrote a cracking article all about &#039;playing the field&#039;. As it turns out, the article didn&#039;t go into as much detail as it could have.<br />
I&#039;ve rectified this by being more explicit in today&#039;s article on The God I&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Makes You Who You Are? by The Scotty Stevens Show</title>
		<link>http://thegodisyou.com/what-makes-you-who-you-are/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scotty Stevens Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegodisyou.com/what-makes-you-who-you-are/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What Makes You Who You Are?...&lt;/strong&gt;

A while ago, I wrote an article about how one defines who they are. I answered such questions such, &#8220;What does it mean to be yourself?&#8221; and &#8220;Why are people so scared of &#8216;not being themselves?&#8217; &#8221;
I didn&#8217;t feel I...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What Makes You Who You Are?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A while ago, I wrote an article about how one defines who they are. I answered such questions such, &#034;What does it mean to be yourself?&#034; and &#034;Why are people so scared of &#039;not being themselves?&#039; &#034;<br />
I didn&#039;t feel I&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do We Need Easter Sunday Trading Laws? by The Scotty Stevens Show</title>
		<link>http://thegodisyou.com/do-we-need-easter-sunday-trading-laws/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scotty Stevens Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 01:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegodisyou.com/do-we-need-easter-sunday-trading-laws/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Do We Need Easter Sunday Trading Laws?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Today is Easter Sunday in the UK at least. And this time every year, debates rage across the land as to whether businesses should run on this day.
As usual, the answer can be found at The God Is You. Head over there now, read the post, Do We Need Easte...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Do We Need Easter Sunday Trading Laws?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Today is Easter Sunday in the UK at least. And this time every year, debates rage across the land as to whether businesses should run on this day.<br />
As usual, the answer can be found at The God Is You. Head over there now, read the post, Do We Need Easte&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
